Dbsseven ( talk) 03:51, 2 June 2018 (UTC) Reply This can be discussed further here if needed. Dbsseven ( talk) 17:46, (UTC) Reply Since the fundamental issue (forum posts cannot be the basis for edits per WP:SPS) is unchallenged, I am going to go ahead and edit accordingly. ( Verifiability, not truth.) It should be reverted. A core policy of WP is Verifiability and in this case there is not a reliable source to support the edit. But unless there is a reliable source, a forum post cannot be used as the source for an edit. contribs) I understand your frustration with feature sets of older hardware.Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthew Anthony Smith ( talk until now, i know the picture wasn't doctored, and because of wikipedia's rules you will never get the up to date information on Direct3D since it changes all the time with windows updates. Dbsseven ( talk) 17:34, (UTC) Reply fair enough, but there is no sources of this because no one has looked at DXDiag with their Terascale 2+ series cards and posted about it. User:ScotXW 11:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC) Reply To be clear, my point is not if DxDiag is reliable, but if the forum poster is reliable. There might be huge discrepancies between the facts and the intentions of the AMD/Ndvidia/Intel/etc. Good and reliable sources for information. This is a fact, and should be documented correctly. I think in such a case we document, no support.ĭirect3D 12.0 feature_level 12.0 is not supported by many AMD or Nvidia GPUs! But instead only Direct3D 12.0 feature_level 11.bla. These GPUs could run Vulkan, but there are no drivers for them. What if the hardware could support drivers that comply with say Vulkan 1.0, but nobody bother to write drivers for that? This seems to be the case for the TeraScale 2 (VLIW5) and TeraScale 3 (VLIW4). But each operating system needs specific device drivers. But of course, the hardware requires device drivers to be used conveniently. When I started this page, I intended to document the hardware.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |